WBridge5 battled Jack for the title, with a
Jack easily defeated Shark Bridge, 183-58. The semifinal matches, WBridge5 defeated Bridge Baron by a score of 154-123 and Possible variations in play depend on the limited hand samples used in the play To more readily win the jack knowing partner has no more trumps. Of course, playing one high spadeīefore returning the ♠8 might pick up the singleton jack, or induce South Ruffing with the 8 and leading the ♠Q at trick two never wins against jackĭucked the spade return, guaranteeing defeat, as winning and returning a club In hearts and declarer can't get to its hand to pull the last trump.), while Succeed on many hands (not on this one with a club return because South is void If the player with jack forth wins the jack at trick two, declarer will Gives up the overtrick when trumps are 3-2 or if there is a singleton jack, butĬan win if spades are jack fourth in either hand. Looking sequence of plays, but a reasonable plan. [7♠ is the best contract, as it makes almost always when 6 ♥Īnd Q-Plus Bridge ruffed with the ♠Q and led the ♠8! A strange The other table Q-Plus Bridge played in the superior 6♠ contract from the Played it there, making 7 on a spade lead. Table 1 Jack made the unfortunate 'blind' lead of a spade and 6 ♥ĭoubled over 2 ♥ and had an easy club leadĪ strange play at trick one is right.but to noĪ most interesting play occurred in the Q-Plus Game force (3) waiting, denies 3 hearts (4) 2 keycards Game force (3) 2 keycards with diamond void This worked well for Q-Plus Bridge against Mooseīridge, as Q-Plus Bridge was allowed to play in 2 ♥, making four for a 2-IMP pickup. Pass was the most popular choice, and, at four tables, the final contract wasġNT, with eight tricks available under normal play.
Question: What to do with a weak 4-4-3-2 hand when partner opens a strong 1NT? Was eliminated with 99 VPs Micro Bridge (Tomio and Yumiko Uchida, Japan)įinished with 74 VPs and newcomer Moose Bridge managed only 6 VPs.ĭeal (hands rotated) from the first round robin match raised an interesting
(Hans Leber, Germany) losing its last match to Shark Bridge by a 24-6 VP margin, WBridge5 (developer Yves Costel, France) topped the field with 110 VPs Sharkīridge (John Norris, Denmark) was close behind with 108 VPs Jack ( Hans Kuijf, The Netherlands) followed with 106 VPs Bridgeīaron (Stephen Smith, USA) rounded out the top four with 103 VPs Q-Plus Bridge Going into the seventh and last round, any of five entries could have finished from first
With carryover, to the 64-board semifinal KO stage.ĭevelopers entered their bots in the six-day event. International 30-Victory Point (VP) scale (0-3 IMPs is 15-15 VPs 4-10 IMPs isġ6-14 VPs up through 101+ IMPs is 25-0 VPs). The event starts with a 32-board round-robin scored on the Timing of play was set at two minutes per pair per deal.įormat is team play, with each team consisting of four identical robots.
Shark bridge philadelphia windows#
Workstation xw6200) were used, running under Windows XP Pro. This year dual Intel Xeon processors 3.6GHz/2GB Ram desktops (HP Of information when explanations of bids are necessary.
Shark bridge philadelphia manual#
Play proceeds automatically, with pauses for occasional manual exchanges For the complete history and details of previous championships, as wellĪs many articles on robot play, go to Technicalīridge ‘table’ consists of a Bridge Monitor (BM) that manages the game, andįour connecting computers that seat the robots. Year’s event will be held October 23-28, 2011, in The Netherlands, alongside Since its inception in 1997, the WCBC has been held annually alongside an (WBF), was held in Philadelphia, PA, USA, alongside the WBF’s 14 th ANNUAL WORLD COMPUTER-BRIDGE CHAMPIONSHIPġ4 th annual World Computer-Bridge Championship (WCBC), hosted by the AmericanĬontract Bridge League (ACBL) and the World Bridge Federation
0 kommentar(er)
